(This article originally appeared in Experimental Inquiries, edited by H. E. Le Grand, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990), pp. 137-166. It appears at MendelWeb, for non-commercial educational use only, with the kind permission of the author and Kluwer. Although you are welcome to download this text, please do not reproduce it without the permission of the author and Kluwer Academic Publishing.)
Copyright © 1990 by Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Barber, B. (1962). Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery. In The Sociology of Science. Ed. B. Barber and W. Hirsch, pp. 539-556. New York: The Free Press.
Bateson, W. (1909). Mendel's Principles of Heredity. cambridge: cambridge University Press.
Bateson, W. (1914). Address of the President of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Science 40, pp. 287-302.
Bateson, W. and Saunders, E. R. (1902) Experimental Studies in the Physiology of Heredity. Reports to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society i, pp. 1-160.
Beadle, G.W. (1967). Mendelism, 1965. In Heritage from Mendel ed. R.A. Brink and E.D. Styles, pp. 335-350. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Brannigan, A. (1981) The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brannigan, A. (1979). The Reification of Gregor Mendel. Social Studies of Science 9, 423-454.
Callender, L.A. (1988). Gregor Mendel: An opponent of Descent with Modification. History of Science 26, 41-75.
Campbell, M. (1976). Explanations of Mendel's Results. Centaurus 20, 159-174.
Collins, H. (1985). Changing Order. Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage Publications.
Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. London: Penguin Books.
De Beer, G. (1964). Mendel, Darwin and Fisher (1865-1965). Notes and Records of the Royal Society 19, 192-226.
Dunn, L.C. (1965). A Short History of Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Edwards, A.W.F. (1987). Defending Mendel meredly perpetuating a Myth. Nature 326, 449.
Eisley, Loren, (1961) Darwin's Century. Evolution and the Men Who Discovered it. New York: Anchor Books.
Fisher, R.A. (1936). Has Mendel's Work Been Rediscovered? Annals of Science 1, 115-137.
Forman, P. (1969). The Discovery of the Diffraction of X-rays by Crystals: A Critique of Myths. Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 5, 38-71.
Gasking, E.B. (1959). Why Was Mendel's Work Ignored? Journal of the History of Ideas 20, 60-84.
Iltis H. (1966). The Life of Mendel. New York: W.W. Norton.
Johannsen, W. (1911). The Genotype Conception of Heredity. American Naturalist 45, 129-159.
Kevles, D. (1980). Genetics in the United States and Great Britain, 1890-1930: A Review with Speculations. Isis 71, 441-455.
MacKenzie, D. (1981). Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Medawar, P. (1963). Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud? The Listener September 12, pp. 377-378.
Moore, J. (1986). Socializing Darwinism: Historiography and the Fortunes of a Phrase. In Science as Politics ed. Les Levidow, pp.38-80. London: Free Association Books.
Nemec, B. (1965). Before Mendel. In Fundamenta genetica. ed. J. Krizenecky, pp. 1-13. Osterhout and Brno.
Olby, R. (1966). Origins of Mendelism. New York: Schocken Books.
Olby, R. (1979). Mendel No Mendelian? History of Science 17, 53-72.
Pilgrim, I. (1984). The Too Good To Be True Paradox and Gregor Mendel. The Journal of Heredity 75, 501-502.
Provine, W.B. (1971). The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sapp, J. (1990) Where the Truth Lies. Franz Moewus and The Origins of Molecular Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sapp, J. (1987). Beyond the Gene. Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sapp, J. (1986). "Inside the Cell: Genetic Methodology and the Case of the Cytoplasm." In J. Schuster and R. Yeo eds., The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986, pp. 167-202.
Shapin, S. (1984). Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology Social Studies of Science 14, 481-520.
Shapin, S. and Barnes, B. (1979). Darwin and Social Darwinism: Purity and History. In Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture. ed. S. Shapin and B. Barnes, pp. 125-139. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Sinnot, E., Dunn, and Dobzansky, T. (1958) Principles of Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stern, C. and Sherwood E.R. eds. (1966) The Origin of Genetics. A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Sturtevant, A.H. (1965) A Short History of Genetics. New York: Harper and Row.
Thoday, J.M. (1966). Mendel's Work as an Introduction to Genetics. Advancement in Science 23, 120-134.
Van Valen, L.M. (1987). Mendel was no Fraud. Nature 325, 395.
Weinstein, A. How Unknown Was Mendel's Paper? Journal of the History of Biology 10, 341-364.
Wright, S., (1966). Mendel's Ratios. In Origin of Genetics, eds., C. Stern and E. Sherwood, pp. 173-175. San Fransisco: W.H. Feeman.
Young, R. (1971). Darwin's Metaphor: Does Nature Select? The Monist 55, 442-503.
Zirkle, C., Gregor Mendel and His Precursors. Isis 42, 97-104.
(This article originally appeared in Experimental Inquiries, edited by H. E. Le Grand, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990), pp. 137-166. It appears at MendelWeb, for non-commercial educational use only, with the kind permission of the author and Kluwer. Although you are welcome to download this text, please do not reproduce it without the permission of the author and Kluwer Academic Publishing.)